Eleven months after Brandie Barbiere stopped paying the mortgage on her Milliken, Colo., home, her husband found out when he returned from work to see their possessions piled on the front lawn. As a sheriff’s deputy supervised the Oct. 5, 2011, eviction, he confronted his wife and wrestled with his anger. A few minutes later he spotted photographer John Moore. “Who the hell are you?” the husband exclaimed.
“I said I was very sorry this was happening and that I was taking some pictures to show what people all around the country were going through,” Moore recalled. “And he let me stay.”
Moore is one of a small cadre of photographers who have set out to record the life-altering event of a foreclosure, which sometimes is climaxed by an eviction lasting at most two hours. Moore’s pictures and those of 10 other photographers (see slideshow below) form a new exhibit, “Foreclosed: Documents from the American Housing Crisis,” at the Alice Austen House on New York City’s Staten Island, which held its opening reception earlier this month.
Since 2009, Moore has photographed hundreds of evictions in Colorado. “Everybody had a different story,” he said. “Some people had lost their jobs and could no longer make their mortgage payments.”
Barbiere’s foreclosure was triggered by the shrinking of her child care business. Other homeowners had assumed balloon mortgages whose rates readjusted to levels they could not afford. And then there’s Tracy Munch, whom Moore photographed on Feb. 2, 2009, in Colorado’s Adams County. Although she paid her rent faithfully, Moore said, her family was evicted because her landlord had stopped paying the mortgage.
Moore immersed himself in the world of foreclosures after a three-year posting for Getty Images in Islamabad. He returned to a United States besieged by recession and wanted to chronicle one of the causes: the bursting of the real estate bubble. “The struggle was trying to get access to the actual moment when people were being evicted from their homes,” he said.
Tell us how you’d like to see banks change the way they treat homeowners. Please use the comment section for your responses.
It’s been 21 days since the government announced with great fanfare a $25 billion national foreclosure settlement with five big banks — long enough for three generations of houseflies to live, love and die.
But the deal, which resolves claims that the banks forged or “robo-signed” signatures to speed foreclosures and committed a host of other loan servicing errors, isn’t final until the government files it in federal court. Until then, the public is left to guess whether the settlement is as tough on the banks as the government claims and whether the promised enforcement mechanisms to ensure banks are playing by the rules have real teeth.
The final settlement document should spell out in exact language the rules of the deal. As of now, the government has released only a summary.
On Tuesday, Shaun Donovan, the secretary of housing and urban development, assured the Senate housing committee that finalizing the documentation was mostly a matter of “dotting i’s and crossing t’s.” No need to worry that the parties were still dickering behind the scenes, he said.
Donovan also said at the hearing that the papers should be filed in the federal district court in Washington, D.C., this week. But sources familiar with the drafting of the documentation say the filing date has likely been postponed again. Next week is now the target. These sources chalk up the delays to simple logistics: Dozens of state and federal agencies, plus the five banks (JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Citigroup and Ally Financial), must sign off.
Why wasn’t all this done in advance of the Feb. 9 announcement? The Securities and Exchange Commission, for example, often files a court complaint against and announces a settlement with a company accused of financial misconduct on the same day.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development declined to comment through a spokesman, but a gathering flood of leaks about the status of the deal probably forced the government to announce too soon. As such, some delay is to be expected.
Still, each day that passes drives speculation about whether the deal is as set in stone as the government has led the public to believe. A recent regulatory filing by Bank of America with the SEC has added fuel to this argument.
“There can be no assurance as to when or whether binding settlement agreements will be reached, that they will be on terms consistent with the Servicing Resolution Agreements, or as to when or whether the necessary approvals will be obtained and the settlements will be finalized,” reads language in the bank’s annual 10-k filing.
Government officials who are collecting signatures and ironing out the details say emphatically that there are no substantive issues still to resolve. “This is not an accurate description of where we are,” a senior government official told The Huffington Post after reading the Bank of America language.
Wells Fargo, in its annual 10-k filing, did not include this kind of hedging language.
Still, the continuing delay and the Bank of America language are worth at least one raised eyebrow.
Rachel Kendall and supporters will be protesting at the Wells Fargo Home Preservation Event in Sacramento, California on February 8, 2012. They will be protesting Rachel’s wrongful foreclosure and Wells Fargo’s unfair and deceptive practices towards other homeowners.
The address is:
Sacramento Convention Center
Feb 8th – 9am – 7pm
You can read more about Rachel Kendall here on our blog. Please support her fight to have her wrongful foreclosure rescinded by stopping by the event and/or signing our petition at Change.org.
Please share this post with your friends via email, Twitter or Facebook.
We believe Rachel was treated unfairly by Wells Fargo. Please help by signing the petition and sharing the link with your friends. Send Wells Fargo a message that it must stop unjustly foreclosing on hard working American homeowners!